Journals 2017

Journal 280

December 2017

Featured Articles:

  • Will the new UK CG Code make a difference?
  • A question of inequality


Full Contents

‘Adherence to the principles of the Code appears quite possible without any meaningful reference to the new spirit of the guidance. A possible consequence is that a board could comply by the letter of the principles but not really address the ambition that they support.’

Alex Cameron and David Archer


‘Corporate boards are not debate clubs. Their focus should always be on the direction and control of the company. Clearly, a key part of the job is the identification, mapping, mitigation, underwriting and control of risks. But the process of managing risk is not a general exercise of looking at all possible dangers confronting humanity.’

Stilpon Nestor

Read Journal

Journal 279

November 2017

Featured Articles:

  • A new strategic direction for board directors
  • Stakeholder engagement


Full Contents

‘A more worrying finding to emerge however, was an alternative view, with some respondents arguing that even very good HR directors are often excluded from the top table, because boards do not spend time on workforce-related issues.’

Helen Pitcher


‘If companies wish to have a better understanding of the potential impact of their activities on different groups or stakeholders, and to factor that more fully into their decision-making process, then they need to think about it systematically.’

Chris Hodge

Read Journal

Journal 278

October 2017

Featured Articles:

  • GDPR and the cyclist
  • Ruminating on remuneration


Full Contents

‘Yet this week alone, I have had three conversations with CIOs (yes, that’s Chief Information Officers, not CEOs) who are not even aware of GDPR, let alone its impact for the systems and data they are meant to be responsible for. Even fewer have made other key executives aware of the governance implications of GDPR or the impact it is likely to have on the business.’

Sophie Johnson


‘Many had hoped for some fresh and innovative thinking followed by some well targeted reforms. In truth the Government's response [to the Green Paper consultation] proposes reasonably modest and incremental changes which will do no harm and may do some good but do not appear to deliver the significant changes which many had hoped for.’

Vanessa Jones

Read Journal

Journal 277

July 2017

Featured Articles:

  • The threat to the unitary board
  • GDPR and what boards need to know


Full Contents

‘Demands from Parliamentarians, regulators and the press and media to “hold board members to account”, are driving non-execs to ask much more intrusive and detailed questions at board meetings. Management, themselves under increasing public scrutiny from analysts, regulators and commentators, have become resentful about what they see as encroachment on their responsibilities, creating fuzziness about their role and distracting them from the work they are charged with doing.’

Brian Quinn


‘The GDPR will reshape the way organisations approach data privacy and data management. Any data controller that is not GDPR compliant will face a fine of €20m or four per cent of its annual turnover, whichever is greater …. This affects all organisations which hold any data on any European clients/consumers/members. The risks are huge for those who do not comply and board directors will be personally liable for any breaches of the GDPR.’

Penny Heyes

Read Journal

Journal 276

June 2017

Featured Articles:

  • Cyber risk as a board concern
  • Executive remuneration


Full Contents

‘Boards should validate the assurance measures in place for cyber security in the organisation. Similar to external financial auditing, companies should implement a culture of having critical security controls undergo independent review. Over the many years of assisting clients to respond to security incidents, over 75 per cent of cases were as a result of previously identified security issues which had not been addressed.’

Oisín Fouere


‘Although the consultants spoke of many CEOs and executives who were “reasonable” or “measured”, they also described some as “greedy” or “aggressive” … Although instances were given of committees standing up to executives, comments were made that it is easier to pay more than to fight, and that greedy executives often received higher pay.’

Ruth Bender and Monica Franco-Santos

Read Journal

Journal 275

May 2017

Featured Articles:

  • Board evaluations
  • Creativity and innovation


Full Contents

‘So, whilst many organisations are required to have a periodic external evaluation of their board – and others may see it as a necessary evil – the boards that get the most value from an evaluation are those who know why they are doing it, choose the right time to do so, and seize the opportunities it brings.’

David Archer & Alex Cameron


‘Options, choices and possibilities are multiplying. As new business and economic models emerge, past strengths can become sources of weakness and vulnerability. Directors need to be alert to defensive responses and attempts to protect vested interests.’

Professor Colin Coulson-Thomas

Read Journal

Journal 274

April 2017

Featured Articles:

  • Does the board care about management?
  • Reputation matters


Full Contents

‘Good managers bring in more revenue and improved efficiencies. Leaders may set the direction of the business vehicle and determine the volume and nature of the resources, but it is their managers that drive the vehicle.’

John Taylor


‘As with any critical business metric, management guru Peter Drucker’s truism of “you cannot manage what you cannot measure” applies to reputation. The companies with the strongest capabilities quantify their reputational performance on a regular basis, and seek to truly understand what is important to stakeholders.’

James Bickford

Read Journal

Journal 273

March 2017

Featured Articles:

  • Fit for purpose?
  • Rethinking reputational risk


Full Contents

‘At present, there is no effective means of appropriately punishing actions by directors that have a significant adverse impact on their shareholders, stakeholders or on society in general. Any sanctions must, of course, be proportionate and justified, and must distinguish between bad behaviour and poor decisions made in good faith. But that does not reduce the need for them.’

Chris Hodge


‘Once identified these risks are hard to discuss because they are “off limits”. We humans operate under complex social conventions that include what anthropologists call “social silences”: things people won’t discuss because, as Gillian Tett put it, they are “dull, taboo, obvious or impolite”. … As a result, these risks fester and incubate, unseen and unmanaged.’

Anthony Fitzsimmons and Derek Atkins

Read Journal

Journal 272

February 2017

Featured Articles:

  • Improving the framework of UK CG
  • How to be a good non-exec


Full Contents

‘So the Government should not squander this opportunity by focusing on some of the symptoms of the problem but rather address the fundamental issues which are concerned not with developing yet more rules (we have a good UK Corporate Governance Code) but in improving the behaviour of directors and boards.’

Gerry Brown


‘Knowing how to conduct yourself at a board meeting is an art-form. Boards are living organisms, with the relationships between the members crucial in determining whether they function as effective units.’

Brian Quinn

Read Journal

Journal 271

January 2017

Featured Articles:

  • Companies must think ‘beyond profit’
  • A surprising interest in governance


Full Contents

‘Encouragingly, almost all executives believe that being able to bring together financial and non-financial information, to better explain how value is created over time, would lead to a more effective identification and management of risk; a more forward-looking, longer-term view of company performance; and improvements in decision-making.’

Sallie Pilot


‘The political imperative seems to arise from a clear reading of the Brexit referendum: that there is a disconnect between business and the people …. Developments in corporate governance may assist in that regard, but perhaps the real challenge arising from that assessment is that very different behaviour and thinking will be required from many in the business community.’

Paul Lee

Read Journal

Share by: